May 15, 2025
Supreme Court and Birthright Citizenship, Sham Peace Talks, Gig Industry Backs Big Beautiful Bill
America's judicial system faces a constitutional showdown as the Supreme Court debates whether single federal judges can block presidential actions nationwide, focusing on Trump's birthright citizenship order rather than its actual merits. Politics crosses ideological lines as justices from both conservative and liberal wings express frustration about the proliferation of nationwide injunctions, with Trump facing 64 such injunctions during his first term compared to far fewer for previous presidents.
• Supreme Court justices debating whether lower courts can issue nationwide injunctions against presidential actions
• Elena Kagan questioning how to stop potentially illegal executive orders without nationwide injunctions
• Trump administration fighting against injunctions from judges in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington state
• Zelensky criticizing Putin for sending a low-level delegation to peace talks in Turkey
• Ukraine pushing for implementation of a US-proposed 30-day ceasefire
• Uber and DoorDash publicly supporting Trump's no-tax-on-tips proposal
• 40,000 DoorDash workers lobbying lawmakers to support the tax break
• House Ways and Means Committee approving Trump's budget bill after an all-night session
Follow us on X at RantingRP and catch full episodes on YouTube, Spotify, iHeartRadio, and Apple Podcasts. For articles, extended commentary, and all our previous episodes, head over to RantingPolitics.com.
Source Credits:
https://nypost.com/2025/05/15/us-news/supreme-court-agonizes-over-whether-lower-courts-can-block-trump-birthright-citizenship-order/ https://nypost.com/2025/05/15/world-news/zelensky-slams-unserious-putin-over-peace-talk-snub/ https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/gig-economy-titans-uber-doordash-back-trumps-big-beautiful-bill-capitol-hill-push
Apple Podcasts
: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ranting-politics/id1677427078
Spotify
: https://open.spotify.com/show/2rFqmUhX6ReG2s2DX824Rk?si=b450dbea7a5a4dce
X/Twitter
: @rantingRP
YouTube:
@RantingPolitics
Website:
www.RantingPolitics.com
This show is for entertainment and/or informational purposes only. All information should be verified and treated as an opinion.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This show may use copyrighted material that is made available for commentary and educational purposes only. This constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 106A-117 of the US copyright law.
00:00 - Introduction to Headline Updates
01:22 - Supreme Court Debates Nationwide Injunctions
04:22 - Trump Administration vs Judicial Power
08:06 - Zelensky Criticizes Putin's Peace Talk No-Show
11:43 - Uber and DoorDash Back No-Tax-on-Tips Plan
14:49 - Closing and Call to Action
WEBVTT
00:00:02.107 --> 00:00:13.262
Hello America, joc, here with your ranting politics headline updates, where we are diving into today's most explosive political stories that you need to know about Coming up.
00:00:13.262 --> 00:00:18.868
The Supreme Court is having a full-on legal wrestling match over Trump's birthright citizenship order.
00:00:18.868 --> 00:00:24.446
Justices are split on whether lower courts can block presidential moves with nationwide injunctions.
00:00:24.446 --> 00:00:27.265
It's constitutional drama at its finest.
00:00:27.265 --> 00:00:32.584
Also on deck, zelensky is calling Putin out for his no show at peace talks in Turkey.
00:00:32.584 --> 00:00:37.823
When you send your aid instead of showing up yourself, that's what we call a diplomatic burn.
00:00:37.823 --> 00:00:46.631
And the gig economy's biggest players, uber and DoorDash, are jumping on the Trump train backing his no tax on tips proposal.
00:00:46.631 --> 00:00:52.564
Service workers, your gratuities might be getting a whole lot sweeter If you're just tuning in for the first time.
00:00:52.564 --> 00:00:58.909
Welcome to America's fastest growing daily news rundown, designed specifically for your commute run or coffee time.
00:00:58.909 --> 00:01:04.052
Stick around for all this and more in your daily dose of unfiltered news and common sense commentary.
00:01:04.052 --> 00:01:06.287
This is Ranting Politics Headline Updates.
00:01:22.861 --> 00:01:32.070
The Supreme Court justices were practically tying themselves in knots yesterday during a marathon two-and-a-half-hour session debating Trump's birthright citizenship order.
00:01:32.070 --> 00:01:36.629
But here's the kicker they barely touched the actual citizenship issue.
00:01:36.629 --> 00:01:44.031
Instead, they obsessed over whether a single federal judge should have the power to block presidential actions nationwide.
00:01:44.031 --> 00:01:53.927
According to reporting from the New York Post, the Trump administration is fighting against three separate injunctions issued by federal judges in Maryland, massachusetts and Washington state.
00:01:53.927 --> 00:02:03.105
These injunctions have kept Trump's day one executive order, which would end automatic citizenship for children of illegal immigrants born in the US, from taking effect.
00:02:03.105 --> 00:02:10.430
Liberal Justice Elena Kagan cut right to the heart of the matter, asking there are all kinds of abuses of nationwide injunctions.
00:02:10.430 --> 00:02:18.570
But if one thinks that it's quite clear that the executive order is illegal, how does one get to that result without the possibility of a nationwide injunction?
00:02:18.570 --> 00:02:22.169
That's the million-dollar question hanging over this case.
00:02:22.169 --> 00:02:26.246
What's fascinating is how this issue crosses ideological lines.
00:02:26.246 --> 00:02:38.183
Conservative heavyweights like Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas have been just as frustrated as liberal justice Katonji Brown Jackson about lower courts throwing around these sweeping injunctions like confetti.
00:02:38.183 --> 00:02:40.269
The numbers tell a revealing story.
00:02:40.269 --> 00:02:53.713
The Harvard Law Review tallied at least 64 national injunctions against Trump during his first term, compared to just 6 against Bush, 12 against Obama and 14 against Biden during their entire presidencies.
00:02:53.713 --> 00:03:00.492
Trump's lawyer, joshua Sauer, called it a bipartisan problem spanning five presidential administrations.
00:03:00.492 --> 00:03:14.350
Justice Brett Kavanaugh didn't hold back either, pointing out that these district judges aren't just throwing these universal injunctions, they are finding these actions illegal because they're exceeding existing authority, and oftentimes we are too.
00:03:14.792 --> 00:03:20.075
The debate got particularly spicy when Justice Sonia Sotomayor posed a hypothetical.
00:03:20.075 --> 00:03:31.120
You claim there is absolutely no constitutional way to stop a president from an unconstitutional act A clearly, indisputably unconstitutional taking every gun from every citizen.
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:32.466
We couldn't stop it.
00:03:32.466 --> 00:03:34.848
That's when things got real.
00:03:34.848 --> 00:03:44.032
Amy Coney Barrett emerged as a potential swing vote, seeming stunned when the Trump team suggested they might not always follow circuit court precedents.
00:03:44.032 --> 00:03:50.828
Meanwhile, clarence Thomas reminded everyone that we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions.
00:03:50.828 --> 00:03:58.336
The case is expected to be decided by the end of June, potentially reshaping how the judicial branch can check executive power.
00:03:58.336 --> 00:04:05.485
Whatever the court decides will have massive implications for presidential authority for generations to come.
00:04:05.504 --> 00:04:09.372
The Trump administration is fighting an uphill battle against what they view as judicial overreach.
00:04:09.372 --> 00:04:21.024
Their legal team, led by Joshua Sauer, is challenging three separate injunctions that have effectively frozen Trump's controversial executive order on birthright citizenship before it could even take effect.
00:04:21.024 --> 00:04:32.225
The core of their argument is pretty straightforward they believe that nationwide injunctions from single district judges fundamentally exceed the judicial power granted in Article 3 of the Constitution.
00:04:32.225 --> 00:04:40.413
According to Sauer, these injunctions should only address the specific injury to the complaining party, not block policies for the entire country.
00:04:40.413 --> 00:04:56.103
During the Supreme Court hearing, sauer hammered home that these universal injunctions create a legal free-for-all where opponents of any administration can engage in what he called rampant forum shopping, essentially picking judicial venues most likely to be sympathetic to their case.
00:04:56.103 --> 00:05:03.206
He warned that this forces judges to make rushed, high-stakes, low-information decisions with nationwide consequences.
00:05:03.206 --> 00:05:11.192
On the flip side, Jeremy Feigenbaum, representing the 22 states challenging Trump's order, made an equally compelling counter-argument.
00:05:11.192 --> 00:05:24.163
He laid out a three-pronged test to determine when universal injunctions might be appropriate, focusing on the practicality of alternative remedies, congressional authorization and alternative forms of non-party relief.
00:05:24.163 --> 00:05:32.894
Feigenbaum didn't mince words about what's at stake, warning of unprecedented chaos on the ground if Trump's order were allowed to stand.
00:05:32.894 --> 00:05:39.257
The states argue they would suffer significant pocketbook and sovereign harms without broad injunctive relief.
00:05:39.257 --> 00:05:57.259
What makes this case particularly thorny is that many legal experts consider Trump's birthright citizenship order to be on exceptionally shaky legal ground, putting the court in the awkward position of potentially limiting judicial checks on executive power at the exact moment when such checks might be most necessary.
00:05:57.740 --> 00:06:05.725
This case represents a critical inflection point in the ongoing power struggle between the executive and judicial branches, in the ongoing power struggle between the executive and judicial branches.
00:06:05.725 --> 00:06:15.351
When the Supreme Court issues its final ruling by June, it could fundamentally reshape how presidential authority is checked, or not checked, by the courts for generations to come.
00:06:15.351 --> 00:06:19.153
The justices appear to recognize the gravity of their decision.
00:06:19.153 --> 00:06:31.891
Justice Clarence Thomas, known for his originalist interpretation of the Constitution, made his position clear with his observation that we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions.
00:06:31.891 --> 00:06:43.612
His statement reflects a conservative view that the recent proliferation of nationwide injunctions represents a modern judicial overreach rather than a necessary constitutional safeguard.
00:06:44.302 --> 00:06:51.673
What really raised eyebrows during the hearing was the exchange between Justice Amy Coney Barrett and the Trump administration's attorney.
00:06:51.673 --> 00:07:04.403
Barrett, typically aligned with the court's conservative wing, appeared genuinely shocked when Sauer suggested the administration might selectively ignore circuit court precedents they disagree with.
00:07:04.403 --> 00:07:06.648
Did I understand you correctly?
00:07:06.648 --> 00:07:17.589
She asked incredulously that the government wanted to reserve its right to maybe not follow a second circuit precedent, say in New York, because you might disagree with the opinion?
00:07:17.589 --> 00:07:24.589
Sauer's tepid response that generally we follow precedent did little to alleviate concerns about executive overreach.
00:07:24.589 --> 00:07:42.000
No-transcript.
00:07:42.000 --> 00:07:54.613
Lower courts issued at least 64 national injunctions against Trump during his first term, compared to just six against George W Bush, 12 against Obama and 14 against Biden during their entire presidencies.
00:07:54.613 --> 00:08:04.689
Chief Justice Roberts seemed to acknowledge the need for balance, suggesting the Supreme Court itself could help address these problems by acting expeditiously on such disputes.
00:08:04.689 --> 00:08:06.291
These problems, by acting expeditiously on such disputes.
00:08:06.312 --> 00:08:19.492
Well, in the latest diplomatic drama, ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky isn't holding back his frustration after Russian President Vladimir Putin pulled a classic no-show at Thursday's peace talks in Turkey.
00:08:19.492 --> 00:08:31.928
Instead of showing up himself, putin sent his aide, vladimir Medinsky, his former culture minister, who, let's remember, once tried to negotiate Kyiv's surrender in the early days of the war.
00:08:31.928 --> 00:08:34.321
Talk about sending a message.
00:08:34.321 --> 00:08:51.327
After we understood the level of the Russian delegation, we saw that they, unfortunately, are very unserious about real negotiations, zelensky told reporters in Ankara, pointing out that it was actually Putin who initially called for these talks just last Saturday.
00:08:51.327 --> 00:08:53.332
So much for following through.
00:08:53.779 --> 00:09:02.491
In response to Russia's downgraded delegation, zelensky made a similar move, dispatching Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustam Umarov rather than attending personally.
00:09:02.491 --> 00:09:12.633
This diplomatic tit-for-tat marks the first time Ukraine and Russia have engaged in formal discussions since 2022, though not exactly at the level anyone hoped for.
00:09:12.633 --> 00:09:16.706
Taking to social media, zelensky didn't mince words.
00:09:16.706 --> 00:09:24.332
Russia once again demonstrated that it does not intend to end the war, having sent a delegation of rather low-level representatives.
00:09:24.332 --> 00:09:31.129
Moreover, such a Russian approach is a sign of disrespect toward the world and all partners.
00:09:31.129 --> 00:09:36.929
He followed this with a clear demand we expect a clear and strong response from partners.
00:09:37.659 --> 00:09:48.645
Medinsky tried to save face upon arriving in Istanbul, posting to Telegram that the Russian delegation is representing Putin and committed to carrying out serious and professional work.
00:09:48.645 --> 00:09:56.649
But Zelensky called the whole thing theatrical, openly questioning whether Medinsky has any actual authority to make decisions.
00:09:56.649 --> 00:10:01.191
As he pointedly noted, we all know who actually makes decisions in Russia.
00:10:01.191 --> 00:10:05.203
So what exactly are the Ukrainians hoping to accomplish with these talks?
00:10:05.203 --> 00:10:09.472
Despite the downgraded delegations, ukraine has a clear agenda.
00:10:09.472 --> 00:10:14.331
They're pushing for the implementation of a US-proposed 30-day ceasefire.
00:10:14.331 --> 00:10:20.990
This would be the first real pause in hostilities since Russia's full-scale invasion began more than three years ago.
00:10:20.990 --> 00:10:27.802
It's not much, but at this point, any respite from the constant bombardment would be welcome for Ukrainian civilians.
00:10:28.244 --> 00:10:30.408
Zelensky isn't just asking nicely either.
00:10:30.408 --> 00:10:42.169
He's calling on the United States, european allies and even nations from the global south to ramp up sanctions against Russia if Putin refuses to agree to this modest pause in the fighting.
00:10:42.169 --> 00:10:51.131
It's a strategic move that puts additional international pressure on Moscow, while highlighting their unwillingness to take even small steps toward de-escalation.
00:10:51.131 --> 00:11:07.129
The real problem, according to Zelensky, is that Putin's representative likely doesn't have the authority to make any meaningful agreements, it is essential to understand the level of the Russian delegation, what mandate they hold and whether they are authorized to make any decisions at all.
00:11:07.129 --> 00:11:16.131
Zelensky posted, before delivering the diplomatic equivalent of an eye roll, by adding because we all know who actually makes decisions in Russia.
00:11:16.131 --> 00:11:20.591
The theatrical nature of Russia's approach has Ukraine justifiably skeptical.
00:11:20.591 --> 00:11:29.470
This ceasefire push appears to be less about Ukraine believing real progress will happen and more about exposing Russia's lack of serious commitment to peace.
00:11:29.470 --> 00:11:41.104
By showing up ready to discuss concrete measures while Russia sends lower-level officials, zelensky is winning the diplomatic optics battle, even if the actual talks yield little tangible progress.
00:11:43.139 --> 00:11:46.844
The gig economy giants are lining up behind Trump's tax plan folks.
00:11:46.844 --> 00:11:55.379
Uber and DoorDash are going all in supporting the no-tax-on-tips provision in what Trump has dubbed his big, beautiful budget bill.
00:11:55.379 --> 00:12:02.217
This is a major endorsement from two companies that collectively employ millions of gig workers across America.
00:12:02.217 --> 00:12:13.898
Uber's CEO, dara Khosrowshahi, didn't hold back his enthusiasm on social media, where he publicly thanked President Trump and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith for championing this policy.
00:12:13.898 --> 00:12:29.979
In his post, khosrowshahi specifically highlighted that the legislation would benefit all tipped workers, no matter how they work an important distinction that would extend tax benefits to rideshare drivers and delivery workers, not just traditional restaurant servers.
00:12:29.979 --> 00:12:35.750
Thanks to POTUS and Representative Jason Smith for backing all tipped workers, no matter how they work.
00:12:35.750 --> 00:12:44.118
Khosrowshahi wrote let's get this done Simple, direct and clearly aligning his massive company with Trump's economic policy.
00:12:44.565 --> 00:12:52.452
Not to be outdone, doordash co-founder Tony Hsu took things a step further by orchestrating a significant grassroots lobbying effort.
00:12:52.452 --> 00:13:00.514
Hsu shared a photo on social media showing DoorDash drivers, known as Dashers, gathered on the steps of the Capitol building in Washington.
00:13:00.514 --> 00:13:11.296
According to Hsu, an impressive 40,000 DoorDash workers have been advocating to lawmakers in various ways, pushing them to pass what they're calling a tax break on their hard-earned tips.
00:13:11.296 --> 00:13:18.096
Hsu praised the House's budget bill as an important step in making no tax on tips a reality.
00:13:18.096 --> 00:13:19.951
This is no small thing.
00:13:19.951 --> 00:13:24.437
When you have tens of thousands of workers actively lobbying for legislation.
00:13:24.437 --> 00:13:29.476
It can significantly influence representatives who know these are voters in their districts.
00:13:29.924 --> 00:13:36.375
The timing couldn't be better for Trump's policy proposal, initially floating this idea back in June 2024,.
00:13:36.375 --> 00:13:42.072
The no tax on tips plan has proven exceptionally popular with service industry workers.
00:13:42.072 --> 00:13:52.633
What started as a campaign promise is now working its way through Congress with serious momentum and corporate backing from some of the largest employers in the gig economy space.
00:13:52.633 --> 00:13:55.394
Talk about a legislative marathon.
00:13:55.394 --> 00:14:06.477
The House Ways and Means Committee just wrapped up what can only be described as a political endurance test, pulling an all-night session that literally had lawmakers from both parties nodding off at the dais.
00:14:06.477 --> 00:14:16.654
Despite the late-night yawns and coffee-fueled debates, the committee ultimately approved Trump's big, beautiful budget bill on a strictly party-line vote of 26-19.
00:14:16.654 --> 00:14:18.873
This wasn't your typical committee meeting.
00:14:18.873 --> 00:14:27.796
We're talking about a true overnight session where members push through until dawn debating and shooting down several Democratic amendments along the way.
00:14:27.796 --> 00:14:35.652
By the time they finally called the vote, at least one Republican and one Democrat had been caught catching some shut-eye right there in the committee room.
00:14:35.652 --> 00:14:41.597
Politics may divide them, but apparently the need for sleep unites lawmakers across the aisle.
00:14:42.240 --> 00:14:51.331
The centerpiece of the bill that's generating the most buzz continues to be the no-tax-on-tips provision that Trump first introduced back in June 2024.
00:14:51.331 --> 00:14:59.317
When Trump initially floated this idea, he made it clear who he was targeting For those hotel workers and people that get tips.
00:14:59.317 --> 00:15:05.346
You're going to be very happy Because when I get to office, we are not going to charge taxes on tips.
00:15:05.346 --> 00:15:11.105
This policy proposal has struck a particularly strong chord with service industry workers across the country.
00:15:11.105 --> 00:15:25.849
Las Vegas rideshare drivers have been especially vocal in their support, with Fox Business reporting that even some registered Democrats driving for Uber near the MGM Grand have indicated they'll cross party lines to vote for Trump specifically because of this policy.
00:15:25.849 --> 00:15:39.408
As one Vegas driver put it to Fox News Digital, the policy would make a significant difference in their take-home pay, calling Trump's plan awesome, even as then-Vice President Harris held a campaign rally just across town.
00:15:39.408 --> 00:15:45.629
It's exactly the kind of kitchen table economic issue that resonates beyond traditional partisan divides.
00:15:47.394 --> 00:15:50.169
Well, that's a wrap for today's Ranting Politics headline updates.
00:15:50.169 --> 00:16:02.972
Thanks for hanging with me through our deep dive into the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship debates, zelensky calling out Putin's peace talk theatrics and the gig economy giants throwing their weight behind Trump's no tax on tips plan.
00:16:02.972 --> 00:16:13.567
Whether you're commuting, working out or just trying to make sense of the political circus, I hope this breakdown gave you something to think about and maybe even a chuckle or two along the way.
00:16:13.567 --> 00:16:20.408
If you're hungry for more political rants and rapid-fire analysis, follow us on X at RantingRP.
00:16:20.408 --> 00:16:26.719
You can also catch full episodes on YouTube, spotify, iheartradio and Apple Podcasts.
00:16:26.719 --> 00:16:32.977
For articles, extended commentary and all our previous episodes, head over to RantingPoliticscom.
00:16:32.977 --> 00:16:39.697
This is JOC signing off and thank you, our loyal listeners, for choosing Ranting Politics Headline Updates.
00:16:39.697 --> 00:16:43.556
We'll be back soon with the updates you need to navigate these interesting times.
00:16:43.556 --> 00:16:46.354
Remember we don't align with a political party.
00:16:46.354 --> 00:16:48.784
We align with you, the American citizen.
00:16:48.784 --> 00:16:53.205
Until then, stay tuned, stay informed and, as always, stay free.
00:16:53.205 --> 00:18:58.738
Thank you, thank you.
00:00:02.107 --> 00:00:13.262
00:00:13.262 --> 00:00:18.868
00:00:18.868 --> 00:00:24.446
00:00:24.446 --> 00:00:27.265
00:00:27.265 --> 00:00:32.584
00:00:32.584 --> 00:00:37.823
00:00:37.823 --> 00:00:46.631
00:00:46.631 --> 00:00:52.564
00:00:52.564 --> 00:00:58.909
00:00:58.909 --> 00:01:04.052
00:01:04.052 --> 00:01:06.287
00:01:22.861 --> 00:01:32.070
00:01:32.070 --> 00:01:36.629
00:01:36.629 --> 00:01:44.031
00:01:44.031 --> 00:01:53.927
00:01:53.927 --> 00:02:03.105
00:02:03.105 --> 00:02:10.430
00:02:10.430 --> 00:02:18.570
00:02:18.570 --> 00:02:22.169
00:02:22.169 --> 00:02:26.246
00:02:26.246 --> 00:02:38.183
00:02:38.183 --> 00:02:40.269
00:02:40.269 --> 00:02:53.713
00:02:53.713 --> 00:03:00.492
00:03:00.492 --> 00:03:14.350
00:03:14.792 --> 00:03:20.075
00:03:20.075 --> 00:03:31.120
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:32.466
00:03:32.466 --> 00:03:34.848
00:03:34.848 --> 00:03:44.032
00:03:44.032 --> 00:03:50.828
00:03:50.828 --> 00:03:58.336
00:03:58.336 --> 00:04:05.485
00:04:05.504 --> 00:04:09.372
00:04:09.372 --> 00:04:21.024
00:04:21.024 --> 00:04:32.225
00:04:32.225 --> 00:04:40.413
00:04:40.413 --> 00:04:56.103
00:04:56.103 --> 00:05:03.206
00:05:03.206 --> 00:05:11.192
00:05:11.192 --> 00:05:24.163
00:05:24.163 --> 00:05:32.894
00:05:32.894 --> 00:05:39.257
00:05:39.257 --> 00:05:57.259
00:05:57.740 --> 00:06:05.725
00:06:05.725 --> 00:06:15.351
00:06:15.351 --> 00:06:19.153
00:06:19.153 --> 00:06:31.891
00:06:31.891 --> 00:06:43.612
00:06:44.302 --> 00:06:51.673
00:06:51.673 --> 00:07:04.403
00:07:04.403 --> 00:07:06.648
00:07:06.648 --> 00:07:17.589
00:07:17.589 --> 00:07:24.589
00:07:24.589 --> 00:07:42.000
00:07:42.000 --> 00:07:54.613
00:07:54.613 --> 00:08:04.689
00:08:04.689 --> 00:08:06.291
00:08:06.312 --> 00:08:19.492
00:08:19.492 --> 00:08:31.928
00:08:31.928 --> 00:08:34.321
00:08:34.321 --> 00:08:51.327
00:08:51.327 --> 00:08:53.332
00:08:53.779 --> 00:09:02.491
00:09:02.491 --> 00:09:12.633
00:09:12.633 --> 00:09:16.706
00:09:16.706 --> 00:09:24.332
00:09:24.332 --> 00:09:31.129
00:09:31.129 --> 00:09:36.929
00:09:37.659 --> 00:09:48.645
00:09:48.645 --> 00:09:56.649
00:09:56.649 --> 00:10:01.191
00:10:01.191 --> 00:10:05.203
00:10:05.203 --> 00:10:09.472
00:10:09.472 --> 00:10:14.331
00:10:14.331 --> 00:10:20.990
00:10:20.990 --> 00:10:27.802
00:10:28.244 --> 00:10:30.408
00:10:30.408 --> 00:10:42.169
00:10:42.169 --> 00:10:51.131
00:10:51.131 --> 00:11:07.129
00:11:07.129 --> 00:11:16.131
00:11:16.131 --> 00:11:20.591
00:11:20.591 --> 00:11:29.470
00:11:29.470 --> 00:11:41.104
00:11:43.139 --> 00:11:46.844
00:11:46.844 --> 00:11:55.379
00:11:55.379 --> 00:12:02.217
00:12:02.217 --> 00:12:13.898
00:12:13.898 --> 00:12:29.979
00:12:29.979 --> 00:12:35.750
00:12:35.750 --> 00:12:44.118
00:12:44.565 --> 00:12:52.452
00:12:52.452 --> 00:13:00.514
00:13:00.514 --> 00:13:11.296
00:13:11.296 --> 00:13:18.096
00:13:18.096 --> 00:13:19.951
00:13:19.951 --> 00:13:24.437
00:13:24.437 --> 00:13:29.476
00:13:29.924 --> 00:13:36.375
00:13:36.375 --> 00:13:42.072
00:13:42.072 --> 00:13:52.633
00:13:52.633 --> 00:13:55.394
00:13:55.394 --> 00:14:06.477
00:14:06.477 --> 00:14:16.654
00:14:16.654 --> 00:14:18.873
00:14:18.873 --> 00:14:27.796
00:14:27.796 --> 00:14:35.652
00:14:35.652 --> 00:14:41.597
00:14:42.240 --> 00:14:51.331
00:14:51.331 --> 00:14:59.317
00:14:59.317 --> 00:15:05.346
00:15:05.346 --> 00:15:11.105
00:15:11.105 --> 00:15:25.849
00:15:25.849 --> 00:15:39.408
00:15:39.408 --> 00:15:45.629
00:15:47.394 --> 00:15:50.169
00:15:50.169 --> 00:16:02.972
00:16:02.972 --> 00:16:13.567
00:16:13.567 --> 00:16:20.408
00:16:20.408 --> 00:16:26.719
00:16:26.719 --> 00:16:32.977
00:16:32.977 --> 00:16:39.697
00:16:39.697 --> 00:16:43.556
00:16:43.556 --> 00:16:46.354
00:16:46.354 --> 00:16:48.784
00:16:48.784 --> 00:16:53.205
00:16:53.205 --> 00:18:58.738